Potential of Using Formalized Parameters for Modeling Speech Action
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-8-112-127
Abstract
The quantitative parameters characterizing direct and indirect connections of words in the composition of the associative field “polite” are studied on the basis of the “Project of a multilingual associative thesaurus of politeness”. The aim of the study is to substantiate the potential of using formalized parameters when analyzing the stimulus-response ratio as a speech action. To achieve this goal, a free associative experiment, general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis and generalization were used. The functions of the index of direct and inverse associative strength, the number of mediations, the index of the associative power of mediation, the number of intersecting associates and the associative power of overlap are considered. The index of direct associative strength is used to calculate the probability of activation of a combination of stimulus — response, and the index of inverse associative strength reveals the degree of operationality of the corresponding combinations of response — stimulus. Analysis of the mediation parameter makes it possible to determine the number of potential signs, on the basis of which predication from stimulus to reaction is carried out. The index of the associative power of mediation characterizes the operationality of the ratio of stimulus - reaction, etc. The effectiveness of the use of formalized quantitative parameters in the modeling of speech action is proved.
Keywords
associative field,
polite,
direct associative strength index,
reverse associative strength index,
the index of the associative power of mediation,
overlap strength index of associates
Supporting agencies: The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-012-00160
About the Author
N. I. Stepykin
Southwest State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay I. Stepykin - PhD in Philology, Head of the Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics.
Kursk.
References
1. Stepykin, N. I., Mironova, D. M. (2020). The project of a multilingual associative thesaurus of politeness. Kursk: University Book. 205 p. ISBN 978-5-907356-47-4. (In Russ.).
2. Akhutina, T. V. (2008). Leontiev-Ryabova’s model of speech generation: 1967—2005. In: Psychology, linguistics and interdisciplinary connections. Moscow: Smysl. 79—104. ISBN 978-5-89357-264-3. (In Russ.).
3. Goldin, V. E. (2014). Associative dictionaries and the image of the world. Problems of history, philology, culture, 3: 14—16. (In Russ.).
4. Kent, G. H., Rosanoff, A. J. (1910). Study of association in Insanity. Аmerican Journal of Insanity, 67: 317—390.
5. Leontiev, A. A. (ed.). Dictionary of associative norms of the Russian language. Available at: http://it-claim.ru/Projects/ASIS/Leont/Index.htm (accessed 16.03.2021). (In Russ.).
6. Nelson, D. L., McEvo, C. L., Schreiber, T. A. The University of South Florida Word Association, Rhyme, and Word Fragment Norms. Available at: http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation (accessed 21.03.2021).
7. Pishchalnikova, V. A. (2019). Interpretation of the associative data as a problem of methodology of psycholinguistics. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23 (3): 749—761. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2019-233-749-761. (In Russ.).
8. Purview, G. C. (2019). The Experience of creating associative dictionary comparison. Philo-logical Sciences. Questions of theory and practice. Diploma, 12 (2): 223—226. DOI:10.30853/filnauki.2019.2.48. (In Russ.).
9. Russian associative dictionary. Associative thesaurus of the modern Russian language. Avail-able at: http://tesaurus.ru/dict/ (accessed 26.02.2021). (In Russ.).
10. Sanchez Puig, M., Karaulov, Yu. N., Cherkasova, G. A. (2001). Associative norms of the Russian and Spanish languages. Moscow; Madrid: Azbukovnik. 496 p. ISBN 5-99744-035-X. (In Russ.).
11. Stepykin, N. I. (2020). Associative field polite: dynamics of psychologically relevant content in the lexicon of an individual. Science for Education Today, 2: 151—166. DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2002.10. (In Russ.).
12. Stepykin, N. I. (2021). Experience in Modeling Associative Fields (Project “Multilingual Associative Thesaurus of Politeness”). Nauchnyi dialog, 3: 106—120. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2021-3-106-120. (In Russ.).
13. Ufimtseva, N. V., Cherkasova, G. A., Karaulov, Yu. N., Tarasov, E. F. (2004). Slavic associative dictionary: Russian, Belarusian, Bulgarian, Ukrainian. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 792 p. ISBN 5-7904-0366-2. (In Russ.).
14. Vinogradova, O. E., Sterin, I. A. (2016). Psycholinguistic methods in the description of the semantics of the word. Voronezh: Origins. 160 p. ISBN 978-5-4473-0108-8. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Stepykin N.I. Potential of Using Formalized Parameters for Modeling Speech Action. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(8):112-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-8-112-127
Views:
433
Email this article 