Interpretation of Linguistic- Cultural Signs: A Scenario for Acquiring a Foreign Language within Context of Cultural Appeal

This article addresses challenges in interpreting linguistic-cultural units by highlighting the heuristic potential of cultural layers as representations of mental comprehension of reality and typical forms of cultural knowledge. It introduces an analytical methodology for studying language elements that function as cultural symbols. Through empirical research, we reconstruct a scenario for interpreting verbal signs of culture consisting of six stages, each associated with specific cognitive operators. We demonstrate how this interpretive algorithm can be applied to Russian and Serbian examples. Our findings indicate that such interpretation results in an interpretant, which is expressed through accurate understanding and appropriate use of cultural signs. Additionally, we explore the cognitive capacity of linguistic-cultural signs — including symbols, prototypes, naive measures, amulets, and names of nonexistent phenomena — and propose a typology of cultural layers emphasizing their link to speakers' cognitive experience. We argue that language acquisition is closely tied to developing cultural-linguistic competence, enabling proper perception and reproduction of cultural symbols. Furthermore, it is shown that interpreting these symbols requires consideration of broader contexts and extensive background knowledge. Key characteristics of linguistic-cultural signs reflecting fundamental aspects of national worldview and value orientations are identified. Finally, it is demonstrated that mastery of these signs enhances intercultural communication and deepens understanding of national identity. Importantly, systematic investigation into cultural layers and integration of our proposed method into foreign-language instruction (such as Russian or Serbian) are advocated.

1. Assman, Ya. (2004). Cultural memory: writing, memory of the past and political identity in the high cultures of antiquity. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture. 368 p. ISBN 5-94457-176-4. (In Russ.).

2. Avdeeva, A. E., Dmitrieva, N. M. (2020). Features of teaching ethical concepts of Russian fairy tales to foreigners. Bulletin of Orenburg State University, 2 (225): 53—60. DOI: 10.25198/1814-6457-225-53. (In Russ.).

3. Belova, N. A., Kashkareva, E. A. (2025). Commentary on cultural and historical facts as a way of forming the intercultural competence of students in classes on Russian as a foreign language. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 18 (7): 2723—2731. (In Russ.).

4. Chernyak, V. D. (2017). Intertextual thesaurus and agnonymy. Cognitive studies of language, 30: 318—321. (In Russ.).

5. Gudkov, D., Kovshova, M. (2007). The body code of culture: materials for the dictionary. Moscow: Gnosis. 288 p. ISBN 978-5-94244-013-8. (In Russ.).

6. Kalanchina, I. N. (2025). Linguocultural concepts in teaching Russian to foreign students. Grand Altai Research & Education, 0s (23): 72—77. DOI: 10.25712/ASTU.2410-485X.2025.00). (In Russ.).

7. Karaulov, Yu. N. (2010). Russian language and linguistic personality. Moscow: LKI Publishing House. 264 p. ISBN 978-5-382-01071-7. (In Russ.).

8. Krasnykh, V. V. (2016). Dictionary and grammar of linguoculture. Moscow: Gnosis. 496 p. ISBN 978-5-94244-051-0. (In Russ.).

9. Levushkina, O. N. (2021). Linguistic and cultural characteristics of the text as the basis for modeling the process of teaching the Russian language. Moscow: Moscow State University. 367 p. ISBN 978-5-4263-0995-1. (In Russ.).

10. Litovkina, A. M., Sharmanova, O. S. (2021). Formation of linguistic and cultural competence in the learning process of Russian language. Bulletin of Pedagogical Sciences, 4: 227—231. (In Russ.).

11. Losev, A. F. (1995). The problem of symbol and realistic art. 2nd ed., ispr. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. 320 p. (In Russ.).

12. Lotman, Yu. M. (2000). Semiosphere. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb. 704 p. ISBN 5-210-01562-9. (In Russ.).

13. Savchenko, I. N. (2023). Localized component of Russian linguoculture as a resource for acculturation of foreign students. Scientific thought of the Caucasus, 4: 98—104. DOI: 10.18522/2072-0181-2023-116-98-105. (In Russ.).

14. Savchuk, S. O., Arkhangelsky, T. A., Bonch-Osmolovskaya, A. A., Donina, O. V., Kuznetsova, Yu. N., Lyashevskaya, O. N., Orekhov, B. V., Kontrakachikova, M. V. (2024). National corpus of the Russian language 2.0: new opportunities and prospects for development. Questions of linguistics, 2: 7—34. DOI: 10.31857/0373-658X.2024.2.7-34. (In Russ.).

15. Simbirtseva, N. A. (2016). “Code of culture” as a cultural category. Knowledge. Understanding. Ability, 1: 157—167. (In Russ.).

16. Tanasheva, T. M. (2021). Methods and techniques of working on phraseological units in the learning process of RCT. Successes of the Humanities, 7: 166—170. (In Russ.).

17. Teliya, V. N. (1996). Russian Phraseology. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. 288 p. (In Russ.).

18. Teliya, V. N. (1999). The primary tasks and methodological problems of studying the phraseological composition of language in the context of culture. In: Phraseology in the context of culture. Moscow: Russian Culture Languages. 13—24. (In Russ.).

19. Tokarev, G. V. (2023). Problems of studying the symbology of regional identity. The linguistic and cultural aspect. Tula: TPP. 167 p. ISBN 978-5-907689-16-9. (In Russ.).

20. Tokareva, I. Y. (2016). Innovative approaches to teaching Russian in secondary schools: culturally oriented education. Tula: S-Print. 144 p. ISBN 9785906513052. (In Russ.)