Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Degree of Semantic Proximity of Words in Mental Lexicon

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-3-151-167

Abstract

The article addresses a pressing issue in psycholinguistics — namely, the modeling of the mental lexicon as a dynamic structure that underlies the processes of speech comprehension and production. The research aims to determine the degree of semantic proximity between words within the mental lexicon. Using a database developed by the authors, titled Interactive Map of Basic Values of the Russian Federation, the study conducts a comparative analysis of the associative field “Health” alongside other fields representing values significant to Russians. The analysis identifies overlapping associates — common semantic features that establish mental connections among the words under consideration. The findings demonstrate that the strength of lexical associations and the degree of semantic proximity between words are determined by the index of overlapping associates. The novelty of this research lies in its ability, through the analysis of the overlapping associates index, to establish a hierarchy of values based on their semantic proximity to the concept of “health,” as well as to quantitatively objectify dominant features that reflect the interrelation and interdependence of Russians’ basic values. The author concludes that the specifically organized structure of the mental lexicon components determines the value-based worldview and potentially possible trajectories for the development of personal meanings, which are realized in communication.

About the Author

N. I. Stepykin
National Research University «Moscow Power Engineering Institute»; Moscow State Linguistic University
Russian Federation

Nikolay I. Stepykin- Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Foreign Languages; leading research scientist of Psycholinguistics

Moscow



References

1. Akhutina, T. V. (2008). Leontyev-Ryabova model of speech generation: 1967—2005. In: Psychology, linguistics and interdisciplinary connections. Moscow: Meaning. 79—104. (In Russ.).

2. Akhutina, T. V. (2022). Model of speech generation of the school of L. S. Vygotsky: fundamentals and verification. Uchen. zap. Kazan. University. Ser. Humanite. Sciences, 164 (1—2): 7—27. DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.1-2.7-27. (In Russ.).

3. Bates, E. (1976). Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics. New York: Acad. Press. 375 p.

4. Bender de Sousa, L., Gabriel, R. (2015). Does the mental lexicon exist? Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 23 (2): 335—361. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.23.2.335-361.

5. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in language production. Psychological Review, 93: 283—321.

6. Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In: New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ. 257—287.

7. Leontiev, A. A. (1971). Psychological structure of meaning. In: Semantic structure of a word. Moscow: Nauka. 7—19. (In Russ.).

8. Leontiev, A. A. (2001). Active mind (Activity, sign, personality). Moscow: Meaning. 380 p. ISBN 5-89357-106-1. (In Russ.).

9. Martinovich, G. A. (1997). Verbal associations in an associative experiment. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of St. Petersburg University. 72 p. (In Russ.).

10. Mcclelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Psychological Review, 88 (1): 375—407.

11. Morsella, E., Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a Cascade Model of Lexical Access in Speech Production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28 (3): 555—563. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.555.

12. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76 (2): 165—178. DOI: 10.1037/h0027366.

13. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36: 402—407. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195588.

14. Pishchalnikova, V. A. (2005). Language as a cognitive-communicative mechanism. In: University philology — education: a person in the world of communications: materials international. scientific-practical. conf. “Communication Science in the Modern World.” Barnaul: Altai state. un-t. 46—51. ISBN 5-7904-0462-6. (In Russ.).

15. Pishchalnikova, V. A. (2019). Interpretation of association data as a problem of the methodology of psycholinguistics. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23 (3): 749—761. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-749-761. (In Russ.).

16. Pishchalnikova, V. A. (2020). Ethnic picture of the world: problems of description terminology. Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2: 6—11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17308/lic.2020.2/2827. (In Russ.).

17. Pishchalnikova, V. A., Stepykin, N. I. (2024). Speech action as a meaning-forming component of communication: psycholinguistic parameters of analysis. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 2: Linguistics, 23 (3): 6—16. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2024.3.1. (In Russ.).

18. Pivkina, N. N., Chebotareva, O. A., Umarova, E. V., Morozova, M. V. (2024). New perceptual trends. Global scientific potential, 6 (159): 25—28. (In Russ.).

19. Seidenberg, M. S., Mcclelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96: 523—568. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.96.4.523.

20. Stepykin, N. I. (2021). Potential of Using Formalized Parameters for Modeling Speech Action. Nauchnyi dialog, 8: 112—127. https://doi.org/10.24224/227-1295-2021-8-112-127. (In Russ.).

21. Stepykin, N. I., Bagan, J., Slobodova, K. N. (2023). Study of the dynamics of the mental lexicon according to the data of a free associative experiment. Scientific result. Questions of theoretical and applied linguistics, 9 (2): 19—33. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-2-0-2. (In Russ.).

22. Treisman, A. M. (1961). Attention and speech. PhD Diss. Oxford. 24—30.

23. Umarova, E. V., Chebotareva, O. A., Morozova, M. V. (2025). Interdisciplinarity as the basis of modern linguistics. In: II Exemplary readings: foreign languages in vocational education: Materials of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, March 26—28, 2025. Moscow: RUTH Basic Training Academy (MIIT). 52—56. ISBN 978-5-605-21482-3. (In Russ.).

24. Zalevskaya, A. A. (2014). Mental lexicon: construct, metaphor, myth? In: Global trends of development of ethnic languages in the context of providing International communications / traditions and moderns trends in the process of formation of humanitarian values. London: International Academy of Sciences and Higher Education. 42—44. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Stepykin N.I. Degree of Semantic Proximity of Words in Mental Lexicon. Nauchnyi dialog. 2026;15(3):151-167. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-3-151-167

Views: 114

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)