Linguopragmatic Potential of Active Processes in Russian Neological Word Formation of Latest Period
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-1-101-121
Abstract
The communicative-pragmatic effects in the generation and functioning of new phenomena in the Russian neological word formation of the latest period is discussed in the article. It informs about nonderivatives, created according to conventional and / or nonconventional models. It is shown that the specific intentions of the speaker and the addressee, their communicative needs, nontrivial topics of communication and the environment of speech, the features of the interaction of communicants, their communication strategies and tactics, etc. stand behind the formation of nonderivatives. Particular attention is paid to the following linguo-pragmatic mechanisms with the participation of nonderivatives: operations with semantic and pragmatic presuppositions, operations with inferences and implicatures of discourse, models for the implementation of conditions for the success of a speech act, the generation of indirect speech acts and speech reproduction of communicative strategies de dicto and de re use, contexts of using metalinguistic operators. The emphasis is made on the fact that the use of derivatives leads to semantic compression, the semantic capacity of the entire expression due to the actualization of various kinds of implicit information. The authors come to the conclusion that new formations in modern Russian speech testify to social attitudes, value priorities and speech-behavioral stereotypes of the speakers of the modern Russian language.
Keywords
active processes,
linguopragmatics,
neological word formation,
neoderivative,
Russian language of the latest period
Supporting agencies: The reported study was funded by RFBR and FRLC, project number 20-512-23003/21 “Active processes in Modern Russian and their research in Russian and Hungarian linguistics” (2021—2022)
About the Authors
T. B. Radbil
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Timur B. Radbil - Doctor of Philology, Professor Head of the Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics.
Nizhny Novgorod.
WoS ResearcherID AAO-6983-2020
Scopus AutorID 57210390493
L. Jaszay
Eötvös Loránd University
Hungary
Hungary
Laszlo Jaszay - Doctor of Philology, Professor Emerit, Department of Russian Language and Literature.
Budapest.
I. Palosi
Eötvös Loránd University
Hungary
Hungary
Ildiko Palosi - PhD in Philology, Senior Lecturer, Department of Russian Language and Literature.
Budapest.
References
1. Apresyan, Yu. D. (1995). Selected works: In 2 volumes, II. Integral description of the language and system lexicography. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. 767 p. ISBN 5-88766-045-7. (In Russ.).
2. Boldyrev, N. N. (2014). Cognitive semantics. Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Tambov: TSU named after G. R. Derzhavin. 235 p. ISBN 978-5-89016-938-9. (In Russ.).
3. Bulygina, T. V., Shmelev, A. D. (1997). Linguistic conceptualization of the world (based on the material of Russian grammar). Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. 576 p. ISBN 5-88766-051-1. (In Russ.).
4. Facchinetti, R. (2021). News discourse and the dissemination of knowledge and perspective: From print and monomodal to digital and multisemiotic. Journal of Pragmatics. April, 175: 195—206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.015.
5. Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and Globalization. London, New York: Routledge. 188 p. ISBN 978-0-415-31765-8.
6. Grice, G. P. (1985). Logic and speech communication. In: New in foreign linguistics: Linguistic pragmatics, 16. Moscow: Progress. 217—237. (In Russ.).
7. Issers, O. S. (1999). Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech. Omsk: Omsk State University. 285 p. (In Russ.).
8. Issers, O. S. (2020). More than half a century under the umbrella of communicative strategies. Communicative research, 7 (2): 243—256. DOI: 10.24147/2413-6182.2020.7(2).243-256. (In Russ.).
9. Kireeva, E. Z. (2020). Addressee factor in Text of the Official Document (Decrees of Governor of Tula Region, Issued in Connection with the Spread of Covid-2019). Nauchnyi dialog, 8: 108—122. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-8-108-122. (In Russ.).
10. Koryakovtseva, E. I. (2018). Internationalization, democratization and “mediatization” of Slavic languages in the context of globalization (word-formation aspect). In: Globalizacja a języki słowiańskie (Globalization and Slavic languages) / Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach. Siedlce: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach. 33—47. (In Russ.).
11. Krasnykh, V. (1997). The System of precedent phenomena in the context of modern research. In: Language, consciousness, communication: collected articles, 2. Moscow: Philology. 5—12. (In Russ.).
12. Kubryakova, E. S., Demyankov, V. Z., Pankrats, Yu. G., Luzina, P. G. (1996). Inference. In: Concise Dictionary of cognitive terms (KSKT). Moscow: Faculty of Philology of Lomonosov Moscow State University. 33—35. ISBN 5-89042-018-1. (In Russ.).
13. Negryshev, A. A. (2020). Pseudosensation on the Internet: experience of linguistic description. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 2, Linguistic, 19 (2): 43—53. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.2.4. (In Russ.).
14. Nikolina, N. A., Ratsiburskaya, L. V., Fatkhutdinova, V. G. (2020). New phenomena in the sphere of derivational formants as a reflection of the dynamics of the word-formation system of the Russian language. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 2, Linguistics, 19 (2): 5—19. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.2.1. (In Russ.).
15. Noveck, I. (2021). Review of Experimental Pragmatics: The Making of a Cognitive Science. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. 282 p.
16. Orr, Sh., Arie, M. (2021). Predicating Truth: An empirically based analysis. Journal of Pragmatics. November, 185: 131—145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.005.
17. Paducheva, E. V. (2004). On the semantics of prosodic shifts and the contribution of prosody to the semantics of the sentence. News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. A series of literature and language, 5: 10—15. (In Russ.).
18. Paducheva, E. V. (2011). Semantic research: Semantics of time and type in the Russian lan-guage; Semantics of narrative. 2nd ed., ispr. and add. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture. 480 p. ISBN 978-5-9551-0431-7. (In Russ.).
19. Paloshi, I. V. (2018). Semantics of diminutivity in the sphere of verbs. In: National codes in language and culture. Language and culture: A collection of articles based on the materials of the International Scientific Conference “National codes in language and culture”. Nizhny Novgorod: DECOM. 214—223. (In Russ.).
20. Radbil, T. B. (2011). “The language of values” in modern Russian speech and the ways of its calculus. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, 6 (2): 569—573. (In Russ.).
21. Radbil, T. B., Pomazov, A. I. (2020). Precedent phenomena as a means of creating attractive-ness in the polycode text of the Internet. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 2, Linguistics, 19 (1): 140—153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.1.12. (In Russ.).
22. Radbil, T. B., Ratsiburskaya, L. V. (2017). Word-formation innovations based on borrowed elements in the modern Russian language: linguoculturological aspect. The world of the Russian word, 2: 33—39. (In Russ.).
23. Radbil, T. B., Ratsiburskaya, L. V., Paloshi, I. V. (2021). Active Processes in the Vocabulary and Word Formation of the Russian Language in the Era of Coronavirus: Linguo-Cognitive Aspect. Nauchnyi dialog, 1: 63—79. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2021-1-63-79. (In Russ.).
24. Ratsiburskaya, L. V. (2014). Russian language of the beginning of the XXI century: vocabulary, word formation, grammar, text: Collective monograph. Nizhny Novgorod: Publishing House of N. I. Lobachevsky National State University. 325 p. ISBN 978-5-91326-277-6. (In Russ.).
25. Scarantino, A. (2017). How to Do Things with Emotional Expressions: The Theory of Affective Pragmatics. Psychological Inquiry, 28 (2—3): 65—185. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2017.1328951.
26. Searle, J. R. (1986). Indirect speech acts. New in foreign linguistics: Theory of speech acts, 17. Moscow: Progress. 195—222. (In Russ.).
27. Vezhbitskaya, A. (1997). Language. Culture. Cognition. Moscow: Russian Dictionaries. 416 p. ISBN 5-89216-002-5. (In Russ.).
28. Zaliznyak, A. A. (2006). Polysemy in language and ways of its representation. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures. 672 p. ISBN 5-9551-0114-4. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Radbil T.B., Jaszay L., Palosi I. Linguopragmatic Potential of Active Processes in Russian Neological Word Formation of Latest Period. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(1):101-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-1-101-121
Views:
702
Email this article 