Concept of DEMOCRACY in Russian Political Discourse from Perspective of Chinese Linguistic-Cultural Tradition
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-9-117-140
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the issue of defining the concept of DEMOCRACY. Its meaning in the Russian political discourse is clarified on conceptual, figurative, and value levels. The peculiarities of this concept in the Russian political discourse are identified from the perspective of the Chinese linguocultural tradition. The similarities and differences in the content of the concept of DEMOCRACY in the linguocultural traditions of Russia and China are examined. To achieve the stated goal, the method of linguocultural analysis of the text was used in the research. Informational and analytical texts on political topics published in the mass media of Russia and China were used as research materials. The concept of “sovereign democracy”, relevant to Russian political culture, and “people’s democracy”, represented in Chinese political discourse, are analyzed. The theoretical foundations and prospects for the development of these concepts, associated with national linguocultural traditions, are evaluated. The ecessity of forming a corpus of interrelated concepts for the development of national ideologies as complex and interacting images of national political worldviews is emphasized.
About the Authors
V. M. ShakleinRussian Federation
Shaklein Viktor Mikhailovich - Doctor of Philology, Professor, Department of Russian Language and Methodology of its teaching,
Moscow
Qi Guan
Russian Federation
Guan Qi - Graduate Student, Department of Russian Language and Methodology of its teaching,
Moscow
Daman Sun
China
Sun Daman - Professor, at the School of Foreign Languages,
Qingdao
References
1. AA — Archive of authors.
2. Kuznetsov, S. A. (2000). A large explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. St. Petersburg: Norint. 1535 p. ISBN 5-7711-0015-3. (In Russ.).
3. Modern Chinese dictionary. (2016). Beijing: Commercial Press. 1800 p. ISBN 987-7-100- 12450-8. (In Chin.).
4. NKRYA — National Corpus of the Russian Language. Available at: http://www.ruscorpora.ru (accessed 25.09.2022). (In Russ.).
5. Stepanov, Yu. S. (2004). Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture. 3rd ed. Moscow: Akad. Project. 982 p. ISBN 5-8291-0388-5. (In Russ.).
6. Almond, G. A. (1956). Comparative political systems. The Journal of politics, 18 (3): 391—409.
7. Almond, G. A. (1966). Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 348 p. ISBN 9780316034944.
8. Apresyan, Yu. D. (1995). Integral description of language and system lexicography. Moscow: School “Languages of Russian Culture”. 767 p. ISBN 5-88766-045-7. (In Russ.).
9. Baranov, A. N., Kazakevich, E. G. (1991). Parliamentary debates: traditions and innovations: Soviet polit. yaz.: (From ritual to metaphor). Moscow: Znanie. 63 p. ISBN 5-07- 001699-7. (In Russ.).
10. Bulygina, T. V., Shmelev, A. D. (1997). Linguistic conceptualization of the world: (Based on the material of Russian grammar). Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. 576 p. ISBN 5-88766-051-1. (In Russ.).
11. Chudinov, A. P. (2012). Political linguistics. 4th ed. Moscow: Flint: Nauka. 254 p. ISBN 978- 5-89349-897-4. (In Russ.).
12. Chudinov, A. P. (2001). Russia in the Metaphorical Mirror: Cognitive Study of Political Metaphor (1991—2000): Monograph. Yekaterinburg: The Ministry of Education grew. Federation. Ur. gos. ped. un-T. 238 p. ISBN 5-7186-0277-8. (In Russ.).
13. Dai Weiping. (2014). Lexical Metaphor Research. Guangdong: Published by the World Book Publishing House. 429 p. ISBN 9787510081750. (In Chin.)
14. Evseev, M. Yu. (2009). Modern etymological dictionary of the Russian language. The history of borrowed words: about 1,000 words that came to the Russian language from all over the world. Moscow: AST Publishing House; Vladimir: Astrel. 381 p. ISBN 978-5-17-042561-7. (In Russ.).
15. Inglehart, R. (1988). The Renaissance of Political Culture. American Political Science Review, 82 (4): 1203—1230.
16. Karasik, V. I. (2002). Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena. 477 p. ISBN 5-88234-552-2. (In Russ.).
17. Karasik, V. I. (2005). Other mentality. Moscow: Gnosis. 349 p. ISBN 5-7333-0167-8. (In Russ.).
18. Kobozeva, I. M. (2001). Semantic problems of political metaphor analysis. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 9, Philology, 6: 132—149. (In Russ.).
19. Kostenko, B. I. (2006). Prerequisites and origins of the formation of the concept “Political culture”. ONV, 10 (49): 211—215. (In Russ.).
20. Larina, T. V. (2009). Category of politeness and style of communication: comparison of English and Russian linguistic and cultural traditions. Moscow: Handwritten monuments of Ancient Russia. 512 p. ISBN 978-5-9551-0297-9. (In Russ.).
21. Likhachev, D. S. (1999). Reflections on Russia. St. Petersburg: Logos. 672 p. ISBN 5-87288- 307-2. (In Russ.).
22. Liu Hong., Yue Xue., Yan Zhou (2021). The study of the worldview in the concepts of political language and political culture. Studies in foreign languages in northeast Asia, 2: 3—8. (In Chine.).
23. Maslova, V. A. (2004). Introduction to cognitive linguistics. Moscow: Flint: Nauka. 296 p. ISBN 5-89349-748-1. (In Russ.).
24. Minenko, E. V. (2017). A fragment of the political picture on the example of the lexemes democracy / democracy. Eurasian Humanitarian Journal, 2: 47—49. (In Russ.).
25. Pang Peng. (2022). The influence of the Russian concept of the state on the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Russian Studies, 4: 76—98. (In Chin.).
26. Pimenova, M. V. (2010). Political conceptual system. Political Linguistics, 2: 47—55. (In Russ.).
27. Popova, Z. D., Sternin, I. A. (2007). Cognitive linguistics. Moscow: AST: East-West. 314 p. ISBN 978-5-17-045103-6. (In Russ.).
28. Revered book: Ancient Chinese texts and translation of “Shang Shu” (“Shu Jing”) and “Small Preface” (“Shu xu”). (2014). Moscow: IDVRAN. 1149 p. ISBN 978-5-91146-969- 6. (In Russ.).
29. Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited. Chatham House Publishers. 542 p. ISBN 0934540462, 9780934540469.
30. Sheigal, E. I. (2004). Semiotics of political discourse. Moscow: Gnosis. 324 p. ISBN 5-7333- 0144-9. (In Russ.).
31. Sun Yu., Kalinin, O. I., Ignatenko, A. V. (2021). The use of metaphoricity indices for the analysis of the speech impact of metaphor in the texts of public speeches of politicians. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25 (1): 250—277. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-250-277. (In Russ.).
32. Sun Yuhua., Peng Wenzhao, Liu Hong. (2015). The Politics of Language against The Language of Politics — Theory and methods of Political linguistics. Foreign languages and the teaching of foreign languages, 1: 1—7. (In Chine.).
33. Tamerian, T. Yu., Kachmazova, A. U. (2019). Names of parties as a marker of ideological concepts of political discourse. Political linguistics, 6: 110—115. (In Russ.).
34. The Great Soviet Encyclopedia. Available at: https://gufo.me/dict/bse/Veche (accessed 05.01.2023). (In Russ.).
35. Tretyakov, V. T. (2005). On the political philosophy of Vladimir Putin. Rossiyskaya Gazeta: [newspaper]. Available at: https://rg.ru/2005/04/28/tretyakov.html?ysclid=l8mql5f5q4492267870 (accessed 12.10.2022). (In Russ.).
36. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of political ideologies, 11 (2): 115—140.
37. Vezhbitskaya, A. (2001). Understanding culture through keywords. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture. 287 p. ISBN 5-7859-0189-7. (In Russ.).
38. Wang Lihua., Lan Xu. (2006). Mencius. Beijing: Zhonghua Bookstore. 344 p. ISBN 9787101052725. (In Chin.).
39. Wilson, J. (2015). Political discourse. The handbook of discourse analysis. 775—794.
40. Yang Xiujie. (2007). Linguistic way of ethnic culture research. Teaching Russian in China, 4: 52—55. (In Chin.).
41. Zakharova, O. V. (2020). Transformation of the concept of “democracy” in the annual presidential addresses to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation (2000—2018). Political Science, 2: 110—125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2020.02.05. (In Russ.).
42. Zelensky, I. A. (1990). The regulatory function of public consciousness. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Kiev. 24 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Shaklein V.M., Guan Q., Sun D. Concept of DEMOCRACY in Russian Political Discourse from Perspective of Chinese Linguistic-Cultural Tradition. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(9):117-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-9-117-140